Publications by Alessia Saporita

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a variety of vision–language tasks. However, their internal working mechanisms remain largely underexplored. In his work, we introduce FG-TRACER, a framework designed to analyze the information flow between visual and textual modalities in MLLMs in free-form generation. Notably, our numerically stabilized computational method enables the first systematic analysis of multimodal information flow in underexplored domains such as image captioning and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. We apply FG-TRACER to two state-of-the-art MLLMs—LLaMA 3.2-Vision and LLaVA 1.5—across three vision–language benchmarks—TextVQA, COCO 2014, and ChartQA—and we conduct a word-level analysis of multimodal integration. Our findings uncover distinct patterns of multimodal fusion across models and tasks, demonstrating that fusion dynamics are both model- and task-dependent. Overall, FG-TRACER offers a robust methodology for probing the internal mechanisms of MLLMs in free-form settings, providing new insights into their multimodal reasoning strategies. Our source code is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FG-TRACER-CB5A/.

Brain tumor segmentation is a crucial task in medical imaging that involves the integrated modeling of four distinct imaging modalities to identify tumor regions accurately. Unfortunately, in real-life scenarios, the full availability of such four modalities is often violated due to scanning cost, time, and patient condition. Consequently, several deep learning models have been developed to address the challenge of brain tumor segmentation under conditions of missing imaging modalities. However, the majority of these models have been evaluated using the 2018 version of the BraTS dataset, which comprises only $285$ volumes. In this study, we reproduce and extensively analyze the most relevant models using BraTS2023, which includes 1,250 volumes, thereby providing a more comprehensive and reliable comparison of their performance. Furthermore, we propose and evaluate the adoption of Mamba as an alternative fusion mechanism for brain tumor segmentation in the presence of missing modalities. Experimental results demonstrate that transformer-based architectures achieve leading performance on BraTS2023, outperforming purely convolutional models that were instead superior in BraTS2018. Meanwhile, the proposed Mamba-based architecture exhibits promising performance in comparison to state-of-the-art models, competing and even outperforming transformers. The source code of the proposed approach is publicly released alongside the benchmark developed for the evaluation: https://github.com/AImageLab-zip/IM-Fuse.

Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a leading framework for enhancing the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to interpret non-linguistic modalities. Despite their impressive capabilities, the robustness of MLLMs under conditions where one or more modalities are missing remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which MLLMs can maintain performance when faced with missing modality inputs. Moreover, we propose a novel framework to mitigate the aforementioned issue called Retrieval-Augmented Generation for missing modalities (MissRAG). It consists of a novel multimodal RAG technique alongside a tailored prompt engineering strategy designed to enhance model robustness by mitigating the impact of absent modalities while preventing the burden of additional instruction tuning. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our techniques, we conducted comprehensive evaluations across five diverse datasets, covering tasks such as audio-visual question answering, audio-visual captioning, and multimodal sentiment analysis.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently emerged as a powerful framework for extending the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason over non-textual modalities. However, despite their success, understanding how they integrate visual and textual information remains an open challenge. Among them, LLaMA~3.2-Vision represents a significant milestone in the development of open-source MLLMs, offering a reproducible and efficient architecture that competes with leading proprietary models, such as Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-4o mini. Motivated by these characteristics, we conduct the first systematic analysis of the information flow between vision and language in LLaMA~3.2-Vision. We analyze three visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks, covering the tasks of VQA on natural images---using both open-ended and multiple-choice question formats---as well as document VQA. These tasks require diverse reasoning capabilities, making them well-suited to reveal distinct patterns in multimodal reasoning. Our analysis unveils a four-stage reasoning strategy: an initial semantic interpretation of the question, an early-to-mid-layer multimodal fusion, a task-specific reasoning stage guided by the resulting multimodal embedding, and a final answer prediction stage. Furthermore, we reveal that multimodal fusion is task-dependent: in complex settings such as document VQA, the model postpones cross-modal integration until semantic reasoning over the question has been established. Overall, our findings offer new insights into the internal dynamics of MLLMs and contribute to advancing the interpretability of vision-language architectures. Our source code is available at https://github.com/AImageLab/MLLMs-FlowTracker.